Pakistan Forum
Assalam-o-Alaikum

Register Here and Enjoy Chat Room. Good Environment
Best for Friend Ship.
Pakistan Forum
Assalam-o-Alaikum

Register Here and Enjoy Chat Room. Good Environment
Best for Friend Ship.
Pakistan Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.


Pakistan Forum
 
HomeLatest imagesSearchRegisterLog in

 

 Disadvantages

Go down 
2 posters
AuthorMessage
imagine_raza




Posts : 99
Join date : 2010-07-18

Disadvantages Empty
PostSubject: Disadvantages   Disadvantages Icon_minitimeMon Jul 19, 2010 8:24 pm

Name-based virtual hosts have some disadvantages:

* They do not properly support secure websites (HTTPS). All name-based virtual hosts using the same IP address must share the same digital certificate. This is because the SSL/TLS handshake takes place before the hostname is sent to the server. Thus the server doesn't know which encryption key to use when the connection is made. An extension to the TLS protocol, part of RFC 3546 - Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions, specifies a way for the client to provide the requested host name as part of the handshake, but it is not yet widely implemented. Some of the shared hosting providers require their customers to get Unique IP in order to properly set up HTTPS.
* If the Domain Name System is malfunctioning, it is harder to use a name-based virtually-hosted website. Ordinarily, in this case, the user could fall back to using the IP address to contact the system, as in http://192.0.2.0/ (invalid IP for example only). However, the web browser doesn't know what hostname to send to the server, but a name-based virtual host requires it. In this case, the default web host is sent back to the browser for that IP address. Therefore most hosters offer an alternative access method like http://192.0.2.0/~virtualhostname to provide access in such cases.
* They will not work with browsers that do not send the hostname as part of requests. This is true for older HTTP/1.0 browsers that have not retrofitted the host field feature from the HTTP/1.1 protocol. (The "Host" header that distinguishes between various DNS names sharing a single IP address was optional in HTTP/1.0; it is mandatory in HTTP/1.1, issued in 1999 as RFC 2616.) Since nearly every webbrowser that is currently used supports the HTTP/1.1 protocol and thus also virtual hosting, this is not a real issue.
* Improperly configured file permissions with shared file systems might give other (compromised) users or processes system-wide access to these files, such as credential files for database access or modification of existing files.
Back to top Go down
sadiaali




Posts : 109
Join date : 2012-01-17
Location : Karachi,Pakistan

Disadvantages Empty
PostSubject: Re: Disadvantages   Disadvantages Icon_minitimeFri Jan 27, 2012 4:09 am

very informative thread about name base virtual hosting hope some peoples learn many more from this thread.
Back to top Go down
http://www.talentidols.com
 
Disadvantages
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Pakistan Forum :: Webhosting and Domain Hosting :: Webhosting and Domain Hosting-
Jump to:  
Free Web Counter
Free Web Counter
Free forum | ©phpBB | Free forum support | Report an abuse | Forumotion.com